HOME PAGE  

 

FORUM 
Is it good practice to create separate classes for immigrants and refugees for the first period of their permanence at school in order to teach them intensively the language of the country of immigration?
    
 
FromDiana De Lorenzi - Cospe (Firenze - Italia)
Received: 02.07.2000
 
 
 
The school system should offer to minority ethnic pupils equal opportunities and to all pupils the ability to grow in a multicultural society and handle diversity in a positive way. This means that the question is not just a linguistic one. The whole organisational structure of the school has to be altered. In other words, the real problem is not the integration of the new pupil. The real problem is how to change the school that is going to welcome them and to turn it into a place where young people learn to “live” diversity as a value. That is a cultural problem.

 

From: Anja Rutgers Van Der Loeff - Amsterdam
Received: 02.07.2000
 
Tenemos esperienzia con cursi intensivi....
We have experience with intensive courses for 10 years now. Parents and children are happy and children learn te understand, speak, read and write Dutch in 10 months. In Amsterdam, we have 34 newcomer classes for children aged 6-12. They stay in the classes for one year= 10 months. We could tell more....


From: Mauro Sbordoni - Cospe (Firenze - Italy)
Received: 11.06.2000
Welcome classes? No thanks. I agree of most of what has been said by the others. Anyway we can’t deny that the integration of these new pupils is often problematic. There is a problem connected to the way of integration, the timing and the availability of additional support. Then there are some variables to take into consideration. Where do the newcomers come from? At what time of the year? In which school or in which classes will they be integrated? Are there kids from the same ethnic origin present in the class and can they play a positive role in the integration of the newcomer or will this role be negative (like sometimes happens with Rom). And the mainstream
classroom teachers, are they experienced, professionally prepared and motivated for this task?
 I believe that new comers should be integrated immediately in their definitive class, but at the same time I believe that this should happen gradually. Both for what regards the permanence at school and within the classroom. The school should thus prepare itself to handle also other dimensions of work/relationships/observation and develop new professional skills in this direction.
Once established certain principles, the integration process has to be decided for each singular case. Each immigrant is different, and different are the problems that will arise. But the school that wants to welcome them has to be able to find new solutions to different problems. We are just at the beginning...

 

From: Lucia Maddii - Italy
Received: 09.04.2000
 
This issue is very dear to me. Much has already been said by Maria and Sabrina. Anyway, I have experience with parallel classes for newcomers. Most teachers were happy to have the difficult kids out of the class for 4 hours a day in the language lab. Some of them even would have given a fortune for not having them back at all. The results have been disastrous. Most of the kids have made friends with their peers from the same country of origin and are hardly motivated to learn Italian. Whenever they are in the mainstream class they seem aliens.
A good solution seems to me special classes where newcomers stay for a very limited period. Just the time to make them feel at ease in the new situation, to get them used to the school life and rhythm. This can be achieved in a couple of weeks. During the first year additional language support can be limited to 2 hours a day.


From: Sabrina Ardizzoni - Italy
Received: 02.04.2000
 
Anyway a child after two or three months of intensive second language learning won’t be able to participate to situations of frontal teaching in the mainstream classroom. In the meantime he/she is isolated from the classroom, he/she is deprivated of the desire to communicate, he/she has a delay in coming to know  school life and the group dynamics within the classroom of final destination. 
Most scholars and teachers agree that the language the child picks up in the first year of permanence is the language of his classmates. It is good practice integrating the child smoothly, explaining to him/her the “rules of the school” and presenting him/her right from the start to the new classmates. He/she should be given the opportunity to have second language learning support for at least 8 hours a week, but in the mean time he/she should participate in those subjects where the language is less important like music, arts, geography, sciences, gymnastics, etc.



From: Maria Omodeo - Cospe - Firenze Italy
Received: 15.03.2000
 
These classes have been tried out in many places. From a linguistic point of view their results might seem satisfying. Yet many new pupils, not having the possibility to share school life with autochthonous peers, feel excluded and isolate themselves more and more. New comers seem to learn the new languages in a more active and vivid way having the possibility to communicate with their new friends. The solution might be integrating the children right from their arival in the mainstream classes, but offering them the opportunity to have at least two times a week a one or two hour language support session with a specialised remedial teacher.